Written by Jonathan Holmes    Tuesday, 02 December 2008 13:51   
Fresh off Air due to mess, 'hobos'
News

Fresh Air, the Edinburgh University radio station, is to shut off broadcasting one week early to ‘clear up’ the studio. This comes after a series of thefts and ‘hobo’ incursions into its Pleasance studio, as well as some strict new rules for the broadcasting talent.

Fresh Air, the Edinburgh University radio station, is to shut off broadcasting one week early to ‘clear up’ the studio. This comes after a series of thefts and ‘hobo’ incursions into its Pleasance studio, as well as some strict new rules for the broadcasting talent.

Student has received a leaked email from the Station Manager, which indicates that due to staff ignoring ‘pleas to tidy up’ the Pleasance based studio, the entire programme output of the station will cease on Friday 12 December. This date is one week before the previously intended close down for the semester. This early bow out is to allow staff to ‘clear up and sort the equipment out’, which apparently has been left in an ‘awful condition’.

The station manager apologised to ‘those who have kept things neat’, but hoped that this blanket ban would teach people to have ‘a little more consideration’ for the studio.

In addition to this self-imposed radio silence/scrub down, the email also outlines several new security rules, designed to combat a wave of thefts and ‘hobo’ loitering which the email claims ‘have been a massive problem this year’.

According to the email, Fresh Air has had a CD deck stolen from their studio, and Pleasance staff have repeatedly had to ‘shoo away’ vagrants that have wandered into the complex. Recipients of the email are advised to remain vigilant and report any ‘hoboish’ activity.

This stern warning comes with a vow to ‘come down more harshly on those evading studio rules’. To this end, a list of ‘show penalties’ is included. An infraction such as a presenter accidentally taking the Fresh Air studio keys home would result in their show not being broadcast for one week, while a more serious crime like ‘speaking about sponsors/advertisers on air’ or ‘being on drugs in the studio’ incurs a ban for the rest of the semester.

Even though the email assures recipients the shut down and new rules are only prompted by the ‘antics of a small number of people’, Student’s informant described the station manager’s actions as ‘draconian’ and ‘hilarious’.

Comments
Add New Search
............scandal-tards
The Lord (87.194.185.xxx) 2008-12-04 14:19:03

all there is to say is this article is a joke, and the informant must have been
overetly stealthy to pass such sensitive information around, im suprised your
top quality paper didnt publish this scandal on wikileaks, blimey what a waste
of ink and time.
Journalistic standards...where?
Stevie Kearney (146.176.60.xxx) 2008-12-04 15:41:32

Oh dear, are you guys going for the 'red top' scandal school of journalism or
what? I'd expect beter from the daily star!

I shall declare my interest now
- I am a Fresh Air committee member and a journalist, so I speak from two
different angles here.

Seriously though, leaked emails, informants, draconian
measures; you make it sound so cloak and dagger.

What you fail to point out
is that this is the latest in a long line of pleas to members to keep the studio
clean and respect the equipment. But you wouldn't know this as you were too busy
trying to get some sort of scandal instead of giving Fresh Air their right of
reply.

I find your article to be lacking in the most basic of journalistic
underpinings - that of balance. Fresh Air should have been contacted for
comment. Without this basic premise you leave yourself open to the charge of
bias; a charge I now feel entitled to make.

I trust ther manager of Fresh Air...
...cont.
Stevie Kearney (146.176.60.xxx) 2008-12-04 15:47:35

It seems to have chopped off the end of my comment as I wrote too much.

Here
it is:

I trust the manager of fresh air will be given a platform to respond
to your scurillous and mischievous article? Otherwise you risk further damage
to the reputation of your publication.

There are two sides to every story and
no room for ego in journalism. I urge you, in future, to take heed of these
points.
Jonathan Holmes (212.183.134.xxx) 2008-12-04 18:57:32

To be honest, the article was written in the playful spirit of fellow university
societies joshing each other: hence the arch tone and 'cloak and dagger' fun you
noticed. The idea we could generate a 'scandal' with Fresh Air at the centre is,
quite frankly, to overestimate the interest our readers have in Fresh Air.


Nevertheless, it pains me that it has caused offence.

Enjoy your last
week of broadcasting.

Jonathan
Write comment
Name:
Email:
 
Title:

3.26 Copyright (C) 2008 Compojoom.com / Copyright (C) 2007 Alain Georgette / Copyright (C) 2006 Frantisek Hliva. All rights reserved."


Related news items:
Newer news items:
Older news items: